Once a rational, if disputable, philosophy of low taxes, self-reliance, and small government, conservatism has been increasingly hijacked in recent decades by those whose consciousness mostly dwells within the most primitive areas of the human brain. Right-wing rhetoric now strives, almost exclusively, to stimulate potent, negative emotion over reasoned thought. In recent years, we have been repeatedly hammered with mind-numbing diatribes formulated to rouse the darkest forces within the human psyche: the Bush adminstration’s evocation of “mushroom clouds” and its endless fear-mongering about dangerous terrorists hiding behind every shrub; the images of the homosexual as a lust-filled child rapist and the abortion provider as a blood-soaked serial murderer; the accusations of Barack Obama as anti-American, terrorist, Nazi, socialist, communist, or fascist; and most recently, the denunciation of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor as an angry, racist, unhinged Latina.
What these allegations have in common is their appeal to fear and hatred by using targeted words to evoke the most negative, emotional reaction. The theme of victimhood – of “the unborn”, of Christians, of our innocent children, of white men, of “American values,” etc. - is also frequently woven into this manipulative soup, systematically eliciting outrage and vicious counterattacks, sometimes including actual acts of violence.
Also drawing on the more primitive parts of the brain, but in a deceptively uplifting manner, is the repeated use of words like “freedom” and “democracy” in order to legitimize and rationalize otherwise questionable behavior. This was a favored technique of former president George Bush when he wanted to stimulate support for his illegitimate war in Iraq. It is also a manifestation of the “Rescue” corner of the Victim/Persecutor/Rescuer triangle that so well describes the unhealthy psychodrama that permeated politics and policy during the Bush administration. According to the script, we went into Iraq to “rescue” the people from Saddam Hussein and to bring them freedom and democracy, as well as to avenge (persecute) the attacks of 9/11 (our victimhood).
The antidote to this vast ocean of hyperbolic and irresponsible rhetoric is the expression of crystal clear thoughts, with words meticulously chosen to articulate a true narrative of events both past and present. Avoiding the treacherous boulders of victimhood and flamboyant exaggeration, such concise clarity can then be woven into a fact-based understanding that facilitates the move toward a hopeful future. Pushing against the fetid tide of vituperation, there are many in the public eye today who do speak with integrity and judiciousness. Recently, Colin Powell once again demonstrated why he is so universally respected with his calm and meticulous responses on a Sunday news interview. It was with no small measure of irony that the most notorious of all fear mongerers, Dick Cheney, wondered aloud if Powell even remained in the Republican Party.
Our new president, Barack Obama, is a true master of the clear, measured, and honest expression of historical context and connecting the dots of experience to create a profound and moving narrative. It is this very skill that our nation and our world so desperately need at present. Whether it is in the overheated dialogue between the Israelis and the Palestinians, between the Shiites and the Sunnis, in the agitated fear surrounding Iran’s nuclear aspirations, or in the highly-charged debates over abortion, health-care, national security, or gun-control, virtually all of the issues of the day tend to get lost in a jungle of polarizing, emotional exaggeration. Obama’s calibrated, thoughtful, conscientious, and often brutally honest approach tends to calm these roiling rhetorical seas while injecting a healthier and ultimately more pragmatic narrative into the public discourse. His appeal to the most evolved part of the human brain, the cerebral cortex, cuts a broad and straight road through the suffocating hyperbolic jungle of the 24-hour news cycle, offering the possibility of a shared road towards the future rather than endless conflict.
The birth chart of the Obama administration drawn for January 20, 2009, describes a chief of state whose oratory, understanding, and outreach will garner significant success. In the 2009 Inaugural chart, Jupiter is conjunct both the Sun and Mercury, describing the wise and professorial nature (Jupiter) of this term’s much-acclaimed presidency (the Sun). This theme will continue to be played out during the various progressions and transits of the four-year term:
the Jupiter station at present is on Obama’s progressed South Node (26Aquarius57), near his natal South Node and opposite his Uranus (25Leo16);
the Jupiter station from September through early November 2009 will be on his Ascendant (18Aquarius03);
progressed US Sun (the president) will be trine natal US Jupiter (5Cancer56) from October 2009 through 2010;
Obama’s progressed Sun will trine his natal Jupiter (00Aquarius53) from July 2010 through July 2011;
progressed Inaugural Sun will conjunct Inaugural Jupiter (3Aquarius32) from October 2010 through October 2011;
Obama’s progressed Ascendant will square his natal Jupiter (00Aquarius53) from June through December 2011;
and the progressed Inaugural Sun will conjunct progressed Inaugural Jupiter (4Aquarius42) from August 2011 through early August 2012.
This is not to say that the significant economic and other issues with which the Obama administration is grappling will be easily resolved. Fears about the contracting economy and the multitude of challenges it brings, including unemployment, are likely to haunt the entire term. The situation may be especially difficult from early November 2009 through August 2010 due to the transiting Pluto/Saturn square in hard aspect to US Venus (3Cancer06) and, from late November 2011 through October 2012, due to transiting Saturn square Obama’s natal Saturn (25Capricorn20) and square US Mercury (24Cancer12), as well as progressed Inaugural Venus opposite Inaugural Saturn (21Virgo24). The ongoing economic difficulties seem likely to be resolved only after these aspects pass. Nonetheless, the immeasurable clarity and understanding that the president offers during his speeches are likely to continue to elevate the national discourse in the foreseeable future.
It also seems probable that a second Obama election will not be as overwhelming a win as the first. The November 2012 election will be held on an exact Mercury station, moving retrograde, an ominous sign for any hope of an uncontested result. There are likely to be many recounts and much confusion surrounding an already stressful drama. Whether or not there is a second Obama term (which I will not officially predict until it becomes clear against whom he is running), a much more difficult Inaugural chart will be in play. The 2013 Inaugural chart suggests a much more volatile and aggressive four years, no doubt, at least in part, because during it, the Uranus/Pluto square will take place in exact hard aspect to the US Sun. The drama experienced during a 2nd Obama term is likely to be extreme, with many powerful, explosive events occurring, especially in 2014 and 2015. The professorial orator-in-chief will be called upon to be even more dynamic and assertive due to many extraordinary, transformative, and far-reaching circumstances. His immeasurable rhetorical skills will surely be utilized to reassure, calm, and focus a ruffled nation and world in a very treacherous time.